Friday, February 27, 2015
For thousands of years strategies have been used to achieve defined aims. Whilst Sun Tzu applied strategy to military operations in sixth century BC, Machiavelli detailed political strategies at the heart of the Italian Renaissance. These are probably the most widely recognized strategists in history, but each individual can count themselves strategists also as they apply their resources and influence to achieve their objectives. In his book, Alanbrooke, David Fraser defined strategy for military application. Whilst effective for military use, it also provides opportunity for application elsewhere. Whether strategizing a business move, beating a rival basketball team, or determining balance between work, family, and leisure, the procedure of his definition can add insight to accomplish aims. He writes:
'the art of strategy is to determine the aim, which is or should be political: to derive from that aim a series of military objectives to be achieved: to assess these objectives as to the military requirements they create, and the preconditions which the achievement of each is likely to necessitate: to measure available and potential resources against the requirements and to chart from this process a coherent pattern of priorities and a rational course of action (1982, 215).'
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Google For Education has tweeted several interesting things the past few days. They tweeted a PDF this morning I thought important as I encourage my students to use the internet for educational purposes. After they finish our program, they receive a tablet. These tips provide great guidelines to aid their online habits.
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Clayton Christensen's book, Disrupting Class, is eye-opening. In this book, Christensen identifies the reason why technology has not made more of an impact upon education despite massive funding. He states that the lack of competition, being a public service, is part of it, and that a mother and child much of the time will have performed the same assignments, switching out a typewriter for a word processor, or in other words, the technology has innovated, but not the way it is used. It is very unlikely much if anything has improved in schools since Christensen's publication, it is actually more likely things have gotten much worse, but changes are happening elsewhere. I would like to point to a personal example as a tutor for under-performing students to demonstrate a step forward. I will detail the strengths and shortcomings of the program, then indicate some solutions that can be made there, and more broadly.
Common Core is a step backwards. This is what I meant by saying that things most likely have gotten much worse. There are many complaints about the program, but the complaint here is that it is not student-centric. By that I mean that the different learning styles students possess are placed within standardized measures, and students with different learning styles than taught or tested are placed at a disadvantage despite their potentials. The third party tutoring service I work with is a good step towards student-centric learning, but much more can be done.
Sunday, February 8, 2015
It dawned on me as I watched a clip of Cornel West speaking about gaining equality between marginalized groups that there is a similar process occurring in the United States as one I saw in Latin America, specifically Brazil. In colonial Brazil, the Portuguese divided territories longitudinally and somewhat proportionally. These became the country's states. Each state had separate demographic and racial ratios, which gave the states various cultures, religions, and histories. The southern states are more prosperous than the northern and northeastern states. The northeastern states are typified in literature and film by the plight of their citizens. This has worked as a narrative against economic activities in the south, and against its capital, Brasilia. These differences made it difficult for many of Brazil's governors to see a reason for broader national government. What was the glue that held its citizens together, and what would keep them together? Citizens could very well feel no national ties, and have no reason to identify as Brazilians rather than Curitibano (from the state of Curitiba), Nordestino (a northeasterner), or even Carioca (from Rio de Janeiro). This glue ultimately rested upon its strength of population diversity, and the syncretism of cultures, religions, and thoughts. Brazil has gained very strong national identity. The United States faces a similar dilemma, but not as simple a solution.
|18th century Map of Brazil|
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Economics are very different, and much more complex than the 18th century Scotland Adam Smith observed. This was addressed in my previous post. Smith observed the foundation for the industrial revolution being set, which would complicate what he observed further with an explosion of mechanization. The inequality between those that benefited and lost out in this revolution is stark, and is due to individual's means and timing. Those that owned first grew wealthy, and those that did not were placed at a disadvantage. The industrial revolution has given way to the technological revolution, and the same rules apply.
In the United States, our industries have largely been offshored. They have gone to locations with cheaper labor, and lower corporate taxes. The US labor force has thus had to adjust to either the service sector or technology sector. These sectors are many times the same thing. This has provided a new surge of wealth as technological innovations have changed the way everyday life is led. This has created the same results as the industrial revolution, very wealthy individuals, and those placed at a disadvantage. Compounding interest is a historical process predating the industrial revolution, but new fortunes have been amassed that have resulted in huge income inequalities between the owners of tech companies and everybody else. Billionaires have been made without the benefit of large bank accounts.
Saturday, January 31, 2015
I have given some some thought to economics in relation to the Cheat Sheet for Understanding Society I posted earlier. This came from a good objection Rob noted about the damaging effects of big business upon the self-interests of individuals. I would like to explore this idea further.
Adam Smith identified a quality in humankind's nature when he described that individuals are set out to fulfill their self-interests. One question that arises is what type of government best suits this nature? With Smith's Invisible Hand at work, 'the private interests and passions of men are led in the direction which is most agreeable to the interest of the whole society.' A government that expects each individual to follow after self-interests, but recognizes that competition between individuals requires trust, would thus be expected to not intervene much in citizens' lives. This is why capitalism and small government are complementary.
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
I visited Tree of Life Nursery in San Juan Capistrano this afternoon with Caitlin. She told me the nursery not only has plants appropriate to the location, but California vernacular architecture and workshop activities as well. These activities include basket making, firing terra cotta pots, and what looked like horticulture and herbology. The architecture is reproduced to Spanish vernacular architecture, and incorporates local resources, and materials like hay bales. I was fascinated by the historical focus, whether broad California and local history, or environmental and Native American histories. There is a strong theme of sustainable practice throughout the grounds, and a fascinating lifestyle that was attractive in contrast to the bustling streets of Capistrano. Check it out!
|Gift shop and book store|
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
I hope Rob doesn't mind that I've made a post in response to his comment (discussion is on Google+). This was too fun of an intellectual exercise to pass up. He expressed some fascinating ideas, and I wanted to attempt to defend the graphic. Whilst his analyses were well thought out, I think there are still some good arguments that can be made to support the graphic as it is. I will address each of his four points in number of their mentioning.
- Breaks down when applied to the role of the state